<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 19, 2007 4:34 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <<a href="mailto:jra@baylink.com">jra@baylink.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 03:50:57PM -0500, John Drescher wrote:<br>> > I thought that as well, until I actually *read* the Google white paper;<br>> > that's not what it says at all.<br>> >
<br>> > <a href="http://research.google.com/archive/disk_failures.pdf" target="_blank">http://research.google.com/archive/disk_failures.pdf</a><br>><br>> You are correct about that article. I am now confused as I
<br>> specifically remember a large study that the conclusion was enterprise<br>> scsi disks have about the same failure rate as consumer sata drives.<br><br></div>Don't feel bad; *I* thought that was the Google paper as well; like
<br>you, I'm sure someone did it but can't remember who.<br></blockquote><div><br>Bianca Schroeder, Carnegie Mellon: <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~bianca/fast07.pdf">http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~bianca/fast07.pdf</a><br>
</div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>TV/IT Engineer<br>WCJB-TV Gainesville, FL<br>(352) 416 0648<br><a href="mailto:cribe@wcjb.com">cribe@wcjb.com</a>