<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jay R. Ashworth</b> <<a href="mailto:jra@baylink.com">jra@baylink.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:36:38AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:<br>> > If I've read and understood the blurb correctly, that device won't
<br>> > genlock to and decode analog video without extra (and probably pricey)<br>> > components.<br>><br>> Like a TVP7002<br>> (<a href="http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tvp7002.html">http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tvp7002.html
</a>)<br>> for $5.75 in quantity 1000?<br><br>*Wow*. Smack my ass and call me Sally.<br><br>That might be enough, yes, and I had no idea those were that cheap.<br><br>Cheers,<br>-- jra<br>--</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>At some point someone is going to make a cheap hardware encoder card that does up to 1080p.. We just have to sit back and wait or a few of us are going to have to learn how to get a computer engineering/circuit design degree. One thing to think about is do you think whoever makes one will get sued by the video industry/cable industry even if it doesn't have hdcp support? hdcp strippers are fairly cheap so that's not really an issue but it seems like manufacturers are going out of their way *not* to make something that can be used to bypass all the DRM garbage.
</div><br> </div>