Well, I ran Memtest86+ plus overnight, and after 46 passes, it shows no errors whatsoever. Are there any other test I can run? Any CPU stress tests?<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/24/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Brian Wood</b> <<a href="mailto:beww@beww.org">beww@beww.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">David Brodbeck wrote:
<br>> On Sep 24, 2007, at 5:58 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:<br>><br>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:04:39AM +0100, Paul King wrote:<br>>>> I would also point to memory. I have found memtest86 less than<br>
>>> reliable.<br>>> FWIW, we're not the only ones who think that: memtest86 was forked a<br>>> while back:<br>>><br>>> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memtest86+">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memtest86+
</a><br>>><br>>> I use plus, myself; it hasn't failed me yet.<br>><br>> I doubt any diagnostic is 100% reliable. Memtest86+ beats any other<br>> I've tried, however.<br><br>The main thing to remember is that "Windows runs OK on the machine" does
<br>NOT indicate that all of the RAM is OK.<br><br>beww<br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>