<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>mythtv-users-bounces@mythtv.org wrote on 09/21/2007
10:52:49 AM:<br>
<br>
> At 10:15 PM -0600 9/20/07, Robert Johnston wrote:<br>
> >Ain't is a contraction of "am not" (I am not amused/I
ain't amused).<br>
> >It originated from the linguistic abhorrence of "mn't"
as a suffix (I<br>
> >amn't amused), so the "a" from "am" was expanded
into a hard A (Ai)<br>
> >and the suffix for an abbreviated not (n't) was added to the end,<br>
> >thereby making ain't.<br>
> <br>
> Every once in a while, just to be funny, I use "amn't" in
casual <br>
> speech. People never really think about how odd it is that this <br>
> particular contraction hasn't come into popular use.<br>
> -- <br>
> Dan Wilga
"Ook."<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mythtv-users mailing list<br>
> mythtv-users@mythtv.org<br>
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Unlike "isn't", "amn't" doesn't
roll off the tongue with any more ease than "am not". Probably
because the mouth position for the ending m and beginning n are so close.
Besides, when I say, "I am not", I am usually emphasising
the "not", often through gritted teeth.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>Its all a matter of emphasis and ease.</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Don't y'all agree?</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>joe white</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>> ForwardSourceID:NT0001B296 </tt></font>