<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">kijuhty kijuhty</b> <<a href="mailto:kijuhty@gmail.com">kijuhty@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><span class="q">>> guide data owner getting upset with people abusing their service and nearly terminating it completely.
<br><br></span>That's not the impression I got at all. Tribune was fishing for a way to get Myth users to pay for the epg data. After they announced they were going to "terminate it", they started soliciting for a model that would allow them to charge Myth's users. If they really wanted to terminate it, they would terminated it--not started fishing for money from Myth's users. If the Myth community had said 'no' we won't pay for it, my guess is Tribune would have gone back to giving it for free because it would have cost a lot more to work around scrapers and try to handle the impact that it has on their advertising model than to just continue to give it for free. But since the Myth developers offered to help them monetize it, of course Tribune was happy with the outcome.
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>-Monetize does not mean what you think it does.</div>
<div>-They were not closing it due to Myth users, they were closing it to ALL users due to NON-MYTH users using the data for commercial purposes.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Please stop cluttering this list and going on like a child.</div><br> </div>