I would think so.<br><br>Mitchell<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rick</b> <<a href="mailto:rbonafied@gmail.com">rbonafied@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br><br>Just a quick update. Since my original post, I picked up an FX5200 plus<br>an LCD 1080p TV. I then downloaded a 1080 clip (about 30 seconds worth)<br>and overwrote one of my existing recordings (on purpose). My reason
<br>being I wanted Myth to think it recorded it so it would be a reasonable<br>test. Oh, I also updated the HD flag in one of those 'recorded' tables.<br><br>While my system was recording some SD content (around 85% idle at the
<br>time), I played the clip. The CPU usage dropped to about 0-6% idle<br>without xvmc. When I turned on xvmc it went back up to around 40% idle.<br> This strikes me as pretty good! Obviously if mythcommflag started up
<br>while I was watching a show, I imagine I'd see some problems.<br><br>Do you think my test case was sufficient to show that the box can handle<br>the load or is there something I left out?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Rick<br>
_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>