<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I heard about that too, but then why would QAM64 work for his card? It
doesn't work on mine, for instance (only QAM256 does, as I'd expect).<br>
<br>
--Geoff Mishkin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gmishkin@bu.edu"><gmishkin@bu.edu></a><br>
<br>
Brad DerManouelian wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid461BC3AC-17E7-49BA-A4A3-B62636EC7656@dermanouelian.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Apr 22, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Geoff Mishkin wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've been trying to get the digital part of my roommate's pcHDTV
HD-5500
to cooperate for a couple of months now. I have an HD-3000 which
works
fine with QAM256, but with his, the signal strength would remain at 0
when I try to scan QAM256. I recently inadvertently scanned QAM64 and
to my amazement, all the channels showed up!
We are both connected to the same cable system, and are behind the
same
splitter. We are both on kernel 2.6.20. I was wondering if someone
could provide an explanation for the apparent two different
modulations
on the same piece of wire.
--Geoff Mishkin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gmishkin@bu.edu"><gmishkin@bu.edu></a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I think I remember a bug in some newer kernels where the strength is
not reported correctly and always displays as 0.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>