<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/14/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Stef Coene</b> <<a href="mailto:stef.coene@docum.org">stef.coene@docum.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Saturday 14 April 2007, Matt wrote:<br>> On 4/13/07, Stef Coene <<a href="mailto:stef.coene@docum.org">stef.coene@docum.org</a>> wrote:<br>> > On Friday 13 April 2007, ryan patterson wrote:<br>> > > You might want to wait until Feisty is actually released before
<br>> > > complaining that is doesn't work correctly.<br>> ><br>> > We might want to wait until mythtv leases it's first 1.x release before<br>> > complaining that it doesn't work correctly.
<br>><br>> When will people realize that the version numbers in Myth really have<br>> nothing to do with what many traditional people think of in terms of a<br>> 1.x or 2.x release cycle?<br>I know, I just wanted to react on a very helpfull and constructive
<br>post .........<br><br><br>Stef<br></blockquote><br></div>I stand by my original post 100%. Ubuntu has a set release schedule. They announce months ahead of time the exact day when the next version will be released. There is no point in spending hours of effort trying to fix a problem with Feisty today. In a couple of days when Feisty is actually released, the problem could very well already be fixed.
<br><br>MythTV's release schedule mentality is fundamentally nothing like Ubuntu's. There is no scheduled date for the next mythTV version release.<br><br>-- <br>_____________<br>Ryan Patterson