On 4/13/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Rees</b> <<a href="mailto:drees76@gmail.com">drees76@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 4/12/07, Brian Foddy <<a href="mailto:bfoddy@visi.com">bfoddy@visi.com</a>> wrote:<br>> On Thursday 12 April 2007 02:33 am, David Campbell wrote:<br>> > Brian Foddy wrote:<br>> > > As Brian Wood said, some have better luck; I guess I'm one of them.
<br>> > > I've been using XFS on a 350GB filesystem for 3-5 years with myth<br>> > > and never had a single problem filesystem related, currently its on<br>> > > a software raid0 of 5 drives. And I regularly let the system reach
<br>> > > within 5gb free and auto erase.<br>> ><br>> > Doesn't it scare the wotsits off you that if for whatever reason the<br>> > volume gets full you are toast?<br>><br>> I disagree with the foundation of your question. How full does it have to
<br>> be and what is supposed to be the disaster you predict?<br><br>Dave is referring to the fact that you are storing everything on a<br>RAID 0 array consisting of 5 drives, increasing your chances of data<br>loss by 5 times by eliminating redundancy.
<br></blockquote></div><br>So what has the filesystem filling up got to do with that?<br><br>Steve<br><br>