On 4/12/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mitch Gore</b> <<a href="mailto:mitchell.gore@gmail.com">mitchell.gore@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div><span class="q" id="q_111e3827070174ee_1"><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/11/07,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Steve Hodge</b> <<a href="mailto:stevehodge@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">stevehodge@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span></span></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><span class="q" id="q_111e3827070174ee_3">
<span><span class="gmail_quote"></span>On 4/12/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mitch Gore</b> <<a href="mailto:mitchell.gore@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">mitchell.gore@gmail.com
</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
but wouldnt they have to convert everything to digital then re-encode it?</blockquote></div><br></span>No, component video is an analogue signal. They just capture at the lower resolution.</span></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"><div><div><br></div></div>yes thats what i said. It has to capture the analog component signal
convert that to digital to get it on the computer then re-encode it in
a lower res and bitrate.<br></blockquote><br></div>They don't capture HD resolutions and then re-encode it to a lower res, they capture at the lower res in the first place. It's never in a digital form at HD resolutions.
<br><br>Steve<br><br>