<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 05/04/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Whyte</b> <<a href="mailto:david.whyte@gmail.com">david.whyte@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br><snip><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The pledge idea didn't work in the past though. We could debate the<br>different ways that the pledge could or should work but when it comes<br>down to it, we have what seems to be a developer sanctioned mechanism<br>
for donating towards the implementation of a great piece of<br>functionality.</blockquote><div><br>That is the way I see it as well, we tried the pledge and it didn't work; next model please. As the devs involved (and OSP) are happy with this approach I am happy to contribute this way.
<br><br></div><br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">As an Aussie that is sick of this issue with overrunning programs, I<br>
was tossing up the idea last week of buying a whole new slave BE/FE<br>and a couple of tuner cards to resolve the problem, with the total<br>cost being $700+. Today, I instead pledged the 25 Euros (about AU$40)<br>and will hopefully help eliminate the problem this way.
<br></blockquote></div><br>I am in a similar situation, although the number of useful muxes on a single transport is limited in AUS, the ability to overlap recordings with a single tuner is my most desired feature.<br><br>
I will definitely contribute to this, just as soon as I sort out the Pay Pal account. Seems it is "locked" and I need to call them or something.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Roo.<br>