Have we beaten this topic enough?<br><br>Is there anyone with a couple of these devices and HD that can just try it and report back?<br><br>-Pete<br><a href="http://www.mythpvr.com">http://www.mythpvr.com</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 3/27/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Oltman</b> <<a href="mailto:cnlibmyth@gmail.com">cnlibmyth@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<span class="q"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">><br>> However due to interference you can generally take the theoretical
<br>> throughput and chop it in half: not many people will get more than
<br>> about<br>> 25-27Mbps out of an 802.11g link.<br><br>And then you need to chop it in half again to get the usable bandwidth<br>for data. once all the framing overhead is taken into account.<br><br>Cheers,<br> Steve
<br>_______________________________________________<br></blockquote></div><br><br></span>I always understood the 54Mbps to be a half duplex rated speed. Thus, 26Mbps is the actual Full Duplex speed. Am I wrong? The of course you have to take into account the noise etc in your environment.
<br><br>Jim<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>