<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3020" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV>I have had one for a couple weeks, to be blunt wireless doesn't cut it for even one hd channel. Wired 100 or Gig works well. I have a 802.11g network, and can watch a show in HD on my wireless laptop. But would never record it that way.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-Dwight</DIV>
<DIV><BR>>>> On 01/16/2007 at 12:36, in message <61728.169.200.173.78.1168979782.squirrel@www.birniefamily.net>, Steve<mythtv@birniefamily.net> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="PADDING-LEFT: 7px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 15px; BORDER-LEFT: #050505 1px solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f3f3f3">Ok - After some emails from mythtv-users I'm looking at getting the HD<BR>HomeRun. It seems like a pretty good setup with not having to worry about<BR>drivers and such.<BR><BR>Found some old mythtv-users emails about it and it sounds like it could<BR>put a good amount of traffic/strain on my existing 100mb ethernet network.<BR>Does anyone have an opinion on would be better - a separate network from<BR>your home/work network or upgrading to a 1G network.<BR><BR>Or even a third option combining both - 1G ethernet on it's own network.<BR><BR>Thanks.<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>mythtv-users mailing list<BR>mythtv-users@mythtv.org<BR><A href="http://mythtv.org/cgi">http://mythtv.org/cgi</A>-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>