On 1/15/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Al B.</b> <<a href="mailto:brekkal@gmail.com">brekkal@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><span class="q"><div><blockquote><div>No, if your PVR-250 is hooked up to the straight coax getting analog signals, you want to have an analog channel lineup from zap2it for it. You did it right the first time.
<br><br>-Jerry <br></div></blockquote><br></div></span>
</blockquote></div>But doesn't that go against the point R. G. Newbury was making in regards to "...not having the same channel appear in 2 different lineups" ?? Based on the way I originally set this up, any channel under 100 would exist in both lineups. (and presumably have the same xmltvid)
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>The thing I was doing wrong was that I had the QAM input using channel lineup 2 _and_ some IDs from channel lineup 1. Even though the channel information seemed the same, the XMLTVIDs are different between the two lineups and that caused a number of problems.
<br><br>Did you run into problems the way you originally had it set up?<br><br>-Jerry<br>