<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>Thanks for your super fast response! I'll look into HDHomeRun more. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
> From: myth@dermanouelian.com<BR>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:52:49 -0800<BR>> To: mythtv-users@mythtv.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Steaming HDTV Performance.<BR>> <BR>> On Dec 20, 2006, at 6:50 PM, BRIAN LANG wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > I'm considering building a MythTV system. I'm a software engineer, <BR>> > so I don't think I'd have any technical problems that I couldn't <BR>> > figure out. I'm weighing the pros and cons of HD Tivo, WIndows <BR>> > Vista Media Center, and MythTV. If I do build a MythTV system I'd <BR>> > likely have a backend in the basement and two font ends. Both TVs <BR>> > would be HD (at least eventually). My concern is the bandwidth. <BR>> > Am I really going to be able to stream HDTV shows at a reasonable <BR>> > rate? What kind of performance can I expect? All 3 computers would <BR>> > be fairly decent machine and have gigabit ethernet. Thanks!<BR>> <BR>> Lots of people use the HDHomeRun to capture 2 HDTV streams over <BR>> 100Base-T, so it is at least able to do that. If you're going to be <BR>> streaming more than a couple at a time, you should definitely <BR>> consider gigabit (You should consider it anyway since the hardware is <BR>> reasonably priced now.)<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> mythtv-users mailing list<BR>> mythtv-users@mythtv.org<BR>> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users<BR></body>
</html>