On 11/30/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mr. Demeanour</b> <<a href="mailto:mrdemeanour@jackpot.uk.net">mrdemeanour@jackpot.uk.net</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
David Brodbeck wrote:<br>> Mr. Demeanour wrote:<br>>> I do have a problem with censoring discussion of a proposed integration<br>>> with a video-source that relies on BitTorrent, simply because some<br>>> people happen to use BitTorrent technology in an infringing way.
<br>>><br>><br>> It's not "censorship." You're free to start another list to discuss<br>> it. This just isn't the place.<br><br>Who said "censorship"? Not I.<br><br></blockquote></div>
<br>
Umm, yeah you did. Okay, you actually used a different
conjugation of the verb "to censor", but let's not split hairs
here. In this part of your post from 9:12am 11/30:<br>
<br>
<div style="direction: ltr;"><span class="q">>><br>>> Voluntarily adopting a position against piracy helps keep MythTV<br>>> 'friends' on side (people like Radiotimes and others that co-operate<br>>> in providing free and easy to use listing data). Taking on the
<br>>> mantle as 'freedom fighters' will only mean crackdowns, and that's<br>>> not in anyone's interest.<br>><br></span></div>
>I have no real problem with people wanting to take "a position against<br>
>piracy" (especially if their own earnings might be at stake!)<br>
><br>
>I do have a problem with censoring discussion of a proposed integration<br>
>with a video-source that relies on BitTorrent, simply because some<br>
>people happen to use BitTorrent technology in an infringing way.<br>
><br>
<br>
Brad<br>
<br>