On 11/28/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brett Kosinski</b> <<a href="mailto:fancypantalons@gmail.com">fancypantalons@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<span class="q"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Can I use ext-3 with LVM for MythTV without problems ?? The larger files I've had are 10 GB - 12 GB (I don't record any HD contents).
<br></blockquote></div><br></span>AFAIK, yes. In the past, ext3 delete performance was an issue, but with MythTV 0.20, incremental deletes largely solve that problem.<br><br>In fact, my plan is to move from XFS to ext3, as I've been getting random crashes using XFS on Fedora Core 5.
<br><span class="sg"><br>Brett.<br>
</span><br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users" target="_blank">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>I was under the impression that if you lost a drive in an LVM you where pretty much hosed. Is this not true? With the new incremental deletes would there be any reason to not use ext3? It's what I have used before Myth and never really had any problems.
<br><br>Allan<br>