On 11/19/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Viitasaari</b> <<a href="mailto:public@viitasaari.ca">public@viitasaari.ca</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I can't help getting political at this point but I need to get one more<br>point in.<br><br>How does the prevailing attitude on this thread serve the open source<br>movement?</blockquote><div><br>I take it you feel you're being discouraged in some way. I don't think that's the intention - certainly not my intention anyway. We are just pointing out that the devs simply don't consider this a high priority for action, for the reasons some of us have listed. This debate has been done to death multiple times here. No one has
yet managed to come up with an argument that has motivated any of the
developers to improve it to your satisfaction (though it has improved over time). So the fact is that unless someone comes up with a patch the situation isn't going to change. </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I understand that people who use MythTV love it for what it is however,<br>if a person comes up with a suggestion which will give MythTV everything<br>to gain and nothing to lose then what harm is there in considering it?
</blockquote><div><br>It's been considered and none of the developers have chosen to work on it. Did you really feel you have a right to dictate priorities to the developers?<br><br></div>Steve<br></div>