Mike:<br><br>Agreed. I'm currently on old cheap hardware (a PIII @ 500Mhz) so I need the hardware help on decoding MPEG, and the "boss" hasn't approved any new technology purchases. Given the significant WAF of MythTV, however, I'm hoping I can get her to OK a hardware upgrade.
<br><br>George<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael T. Dean</b> <<a href="mailto:mtdean@thirdcontact.com">mtdean@thirdcontact.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 09/12/06 09:54, George Galt wrote:<br><br>> Thanks. If I understand correctly, you believe that there *may* be<br>> issues, but you don't know for sure. So I should try it and if it<br>> doesn't work, fall back to
0.19. I can live with that.<br><br>It works pretty well. There are some issues (like FF > 3x, for one),<br>but you'll probably be happy.<br><br>Then again, you (or someone else reading this thread) could step up to<br>
maintain the PVR-350 output if you're really that concerned about it.<br>Although, < $40 for a good NVIDIA card--like a GF4MX440, which is fine<br>for SDTV--is a lot cheaper than the time one would have to spend<br>maintaining the PVR-350 output--and you get OpenGL and more from the
<br>NVIDIA that's unavailable with the 350.<br><br>Mike<br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>