<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The latest SVN no longer gives you the option to
browse the channels in the desired order if you have more than one sat
input. Instead, one has to key in a channel (if you can
remember it) that is known to be on the other satellite, or open the
program guide (EPG) to manually select the new channel on the other sat-pos.
This has been discussed before, and to my horror accepted as the "new way"
of doing thing":</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/217788#217788">http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/217788#217788</A></FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The new method is obiously not working well
for users of DVB-S with diseq-switches and multiple sat positions. Most
scandinavians have the basic package distributed between two providers on
two different satellites (1W and 5E). If we wanted these two providers
separated while browsing we would arrange the channels that way. The "new"
way of browsing has no benefits for us multiple-sat-diseq-users, only causing
headache and angry spouses, and I really hope that it will be made
optional in the future.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Lasse<A
href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/217788#217788"></A></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>