<div>There is also the new Insteon line which uses a RF mesh network concept. Much discussion about this and X10 on the Xtension list <a href="http://void.nothingness.org/archives/XTension/">http://void.nothingness.org/archives/XTension/
</a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mark<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/5/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andrew Close</b> <<a href="mailto:aclose@gmail.com">aclose@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On 6/5/06, Richard Bronosky <<a href="mailto:mythtv@bronosky.com">mythtv@bronosky.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 6/2/06, Nick Ellson <<a href="mailto:grimm@nickellson.com">grimm@nickellson.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > I mostly live at <a href="http://x-10.com">x-10.com</a>, with a few devices from <a href="http://smarthomeusa.com">
smarthomeusa.com</a> (for<br>> > the high power RF transcievers and the Sprinkler System heads)<br>><br>> I used X-10 a few years ago and was very displeased. The RF receiver<br>> got HORRIBLE reception, and I had the 3-way dimmer attached to my
<br>> chandelier melt down and start sizzling TWICE! I love geeking out on<br>> stuff, but I'm not will to burn my home down for it. I now use<br>> Leviton, and would like to find something that will work in<br>
> conjunction with my existing faedra switches.<br><br>doesn't Leviton use the same protocol as the X-10 brand (X-10)?<br>i was under the impression that X-10 was just a protocol for<br>communications and one manufacturer used it as their brand name too.
<br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>