On 3/30/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ryan Steffes</b> <<a href="mailto:rbsteffes@gmail.com">rbsteffes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="direction: ltr;"><br><br><div></div><div style="direction: ltr;"><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/30/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Mossholder</b> <<a href="mailto:matt@mossholder.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
matt@mossholder.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 16:26 -0500, Ryan Steffes wrote:<br>><br>><br>> Which fs would be best for the video partition? ReiserFS?<br>> EXT3? Any others?<br>><br>><br>> Seems like the buzz is towards XFS. I went with ReiserFS because of
<br>> the resizing capabilities.<br>><br>> Ryan</blockquote></span></div></div></blockquote><div><br>
I did the same thing when I first built my Myth system.
However, I ran into some problems where I was seeing really slow delete
times and getting some corruption in recordings. I remember
seeing somewhere that it said you WILL see corruption in recordings if
you use reiserfs v3 (which is what I was using). So I switched to
JFS. (Turns out the corrupted recording problem was unrelated to
the fs). I avoided XFS because of the known problems with XFS on
a near-full fs. I've been very happy with JFS so far and have yet
to have a single problem since the switch.<br>
<br>
Brad Benson<br>
<br>
</div><br></div><br>