<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<br>
Kevin Kuphal wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid441AC9D9.2030503@dls.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Mark Knecht wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
Does anyone know if the Myth developers are working on any 'volume
control / card' features for the future? We're so very tired of this
limitation....very tired.
Where does one make an enhancement request that will actually be read?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Reading and implementing are two different things. The harsh truth is
you are at the mercy of other people's generosity to spend their time
implementing the feature that you want. This may or may not ever happen
and the sooner you accept that, the better unless you are someone that
can code the feature yourself. Sending messages about how tired "we"
are about a missing feature is probably not the best way to get your
request considered.
Kevin
Kevin
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
As the submitter of many an enhancement request I can say I'm well
aware that I am profiting from someone else's generousity, and that I
should:<br>
<br>
1) appreciate what they produce as it enhances my life<br>
2) find something else that does a better job of it if I am dissatisfied<br>
3) stop using it if it doesn't do what I want<br>
<br>
Many OSS projects fall into #3, this one is definately in #1, and often
#2 is the best way to go about things in and out of the OSS world.<br>
</body>
</html>