<div>I know it seems easier to upgrade than to fix the problem, but some people have issues with high PCs and 0.19...</div>
<div> </div>
<div>A 1.6Ghz Duron with MX440 was enough for me to play HD on 0.18... Now my setup that was working in 0.18 on my P4 2.4 with FX5200 isn't working without prebuffering anymore.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Why is the NVP starving, buffer are not big enough? Backend isn't pushing enough data?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I'm pretty sure 0.19 has an issue with that, I'm running 40% idle with 10 Prebuffering pause a second. NVP seems the cause of the problem. NVP is the nuppel video player right?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Steve M.<br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/23/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Dastrup</b> <<a href="mailto:jc@dastrup.com">jc@dastrup.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 20:01 -0600, Gavin Haslett wrote:<br>> Uh... I'm using XvMC with no problems. Granted I have no HD content, all
<br>> SD... But it works like a champ for me. No prebuffering pauses, color<br>> OSD (with the hack installed), and around 20% max CPU on an AMD 800<br>> (hence why no HD).<br>><br>><br>> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:17 -0500, Preston Crow wrote:
<br>> <snipped><br>><br>> ...as I was saying, I have yet to find someone using XvMC without any<br>> problems.<br>><br><br>My whole point of this topic is if you want to use older, slower<br>hardware for HD content, XvMC is not a perfect solution. Sometimes the
<br>problems are minor annoyances, other times the problems are a show<br>stopper. I would suggest to anyone to just buy a faster CPU instead.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div>
<br>