<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Axel Thimm</b> <<a href="mailto:Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net">Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:35:11AM -0500, Larry K wrote:<br>> I have a potentially dumb question about kernels and how you decide which<br>> ones to build to.<br><br>security, space & time<br>It usually boils down to supporting the last 1-2 kernel releases.
<br><br>> I notice that the you are now supporting 2.6.12-1.1381for the<br>> kernel-specific packages. Since I am still running 2-6-12-1.1378, I<br>> assume I need to upgrade my kernel in order to keep up with the
<br>> binary packages?<br><br>Yes.<br><br>> Or am I overlooking something obvious? Heretofore, when I attempted<br>> to upgrade a package that needed a kernel I wasn't running, I just<br>> upgraded the kernel too.
<br><br>But you also need to follow up with all other kmdl packages, too.</blockquote><div><br>Oh, I did. It was only when I tried to do the upgrade that I realized that my older kernel was no longer being supported in the binary packages.....
<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">--<br>Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
</a><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>