Yeah I'm still having problems. Could someone with a working ATI vid card send me their xorg please? <br>
<br>
The following are the results of cat /proc/cpuinfo and /sbin/lspci<br>
<br>
Thanks for the help.<br>
<br>
cat /proc/cpuinfo<br>
processor : 0<br>
vendor_id : GenuineIntel<br>
cpu family : 15<br>
model : 3<br>
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz<br>
stepping : 4<br>
cpu MHz : 3192.213<br>
cache size : 1024 KB<br>
physical id : 0<br>
siblings : 2<br>
core id : 0<br>
cpu cores : 1<br>
fdiv_bug : no<br>
hlt_bug : no<br>
f00f_bug : no<br>
coma_bug : no<br>
fpu : yes<br>
fpu_exception : yes<br>
cpuid level : 5<br>
wp : yes<br>
flags : fpu
vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush
dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pni monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr<br>
bogomips : 6389.96<br>
<br>
processor : 1<br>
vendor_id : GenuineIntel<br>
cpu family : 15<br>
model : 3<br>
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz<br>
stepping : 4<br>
cpu MHz : 3192.213<br>
cache size : 1024 KB<br>
physical id : 0<br>
siblings : 2<br>
core id : 0<br>
cpu cores : 1<br>
fdiv_bug : no<br>
hlt_bug : no<br>
f00f_bug : no<br>
coma_bug : no<br>
fpu : yes<br>
fpu_exception : yes<br>
cpuid level : 5<br>
wp : yes<br>
flags : fpu
vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush
dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pni monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr<br>
bogomips : 6384.38<br>
<br>
/sbin/lspci<br>
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 945G/P Memory Controller Hub<br>
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 945G/P PCI Express Graphics Port<br>
00:1b.0 Class 0403: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01)<br>
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 01)<br>
00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GR/GH/GHM (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 01)<br>
00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GR/GH/GHM (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 01)<br>
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 01)<br>
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 01)<br>
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 01)<br>
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 01)<br>
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01)<br>
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1)<br>
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GH (ICH7DH) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01)<br>
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 01)<br>
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) Serial ATA Storage Controllers cc=IDE (rev 01)<br>
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01)<br>
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)]<br>
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 [Radeon X300SE]<br>
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 01)<br>
05:02.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07)<br>
05:02.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 07)<br>
05:04.0 Multimedia video controller: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16 (CX23416) MPEG-2 Encoder (rev 01)<br>
05:05.0 Serial controller: Timedia Technology Co Ltd PCI2S550 (Dual 16550 UART) (rev 01)<br>
<br>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/18/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Anthony Vito</b> <<a href="mailto:anthony.vito@gmail.com">anthony.vito@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> ><br>> > Why are you using a SMP kernel? I've never used a Dual Core processor, but<br>> > I'm guessing that even then you'd probably be better off with a standard<br>> > (optimized) kernel.<br>>
<br>> I disagree. Its hard for me to imagine any realworld situation<br>> where a smp kernel on a hyperthreaded cpu would not perform at least<br>> as well as a non-smp kernel. And if you have a true dual core cpu,
<br>> definately use it. HT may only be a very modest improvement, but<br>> I have 2 machines with 2 Xeon HT cpus, and I set them both up for 4<br>> cpu smp support.<br>><br><br>HyperThreading is a horrible kludge. It required every OS to rewrite
<br>their process schedulers to not die context switching to an imaginary<br>processor. The Linux kernel claims to have a hyper threading aware<br>scheduler, but I've never been happy with it running on a loaded<br>server. With mythTV, you'll really won't notice any difference either
<br>way, so just the standard kernel.<br><br>Like Brian said, dual cores are a different matter. You must run the<br>SMP kernel or your not using half the silicon.<br><br>However... back to the OP. cat /proc/cpuinfo and /sbin/lspci and
<br>post em if you're still having problems.<br><br><br>--<br>Anthony Vito<br><a href="mailto:anthony.vito@gmail.com">anthony.vito@gmail.com</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div>
<br>