On 1/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dorsey Graphics</b> <<a href="mailto:info@dorseygraphics.com">info@dorseygraphics.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm looking at these 2 cards back-to-back on the Hauppage site:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_pvr250.html" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_pvr250.html</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_pvr150.html" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/products/data_pvr150.html</a></div><div><br></div><div> And I'm not seeing any difference, besides the tech specs. </div><div><br></div><div>
In layman's terms, why would I use a 250 vs. a 150 for a second capture
card? (I'm using a PVR-250 as my current primary capture card).</div></blockquote><div><br>
The 150 is the new lower cost card. Some people would say the 150
doesn't output as good/clear a picture (different chips), but I
switched to a 150 after my 250 died and have no issues at all.<br>
<br>
Jeff<br>
</div><br></div><br>