<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">1. Should I be seeing a drop in quality when I lower the bitrate? </blockquote><div><br>
<br>
Yes. Lower bitrates result in lower quality. <br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">To<br>illustrate: A 1.5 GB mpeg-2 recording, transcoded to mpeg-4 with a 2200<br>
kilobits/sec has roughly the same filesize and quality as the original<br>mpeg-2. </blockquote><div><br>
As the filesize is proportional with the datarate, this indicates that
your original MPEG2 also was at 2200 kb/s, which is quite low for MPEG2
(I record with a PVR-250 at 4500 kb/s and transcode to 1400 kb/s), so
the starting point for your compression is not very good.<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Lowering that to 1600 kbps with high quality and 4mv enc. reduces the<br>file size (prob. to about 70%) but the quality suffers quite badly.
</blockquote><div><br>
1600 kbps should be enough for MPEG4, but it also depends upon the
number of pixels. I do record at 480x576 pixels but as you are
recording from DVB-T you are probably at 720x576, so you would need
2100 kbps to get the approx same quality as I have at 1400 kbps,
because you have more pixels. Mythtranscoding has settings to choose a
different resolution, but it does not seem to work on my system.<br>
Noise is poison for MPEG compression, so as long as you are compression
new films you should be ok with a completely digital flow. Older film
that from analog media will probably have more noise and need higher
bitrates.<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Background areas (like trees) that are fairly clear in the original become<br>smeared blurry blobs that pan in jerky little steps. Movements of foreground
<br>objects (i.e. a shoulder and head shot) result in a blocky pixelating effect<br>as the face moves quickly, but then settles down once the movement stops.</blockquote><div><br>
These are typical artifacts from MPEG4 encoding. <br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">4. If not, what is the high-quality encoding for? Is it a two-pass vs.<br>one-pass?
</blockquote><div><br>
I do not think that mythtranscode can do two pass encoding, but I am not sure.<br>
<br>
I would keep the recordings at MPEG2 at 2200 kbps or check if
mythtranscode can reduce the number of pixels. You might try to go as
low as 400x288 pixels, especially if you are watching on a CRT TV.<br>
<br>
Niels Dybdahl<br>
</div></div><br>