To be honest, I don't know if this would work, but even if it did - I'm
curious to know what the benefit would be? When watching liveTV
you'll be doing a full roundtrip with the video-stream across your
network. Why not just do the capturing where the disks are and
have a diskless frontend? <br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/10/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Joe Harvell</b> <<a href="mailto:jharvell@dogpad.net">jharvell@dogpad.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I am considering building a diskless mini-ITX frontend/backend using NFS<br>over switched 100base-T for the storage. I would be capturing at most<br>two streams at a time and watching at most one.<br><br>Has anyone done this? Any problems with the setup?
<br><br>Also, when watching live TV, does the backend read from the file and<br>stream to the backend? Or does it take what it is capturing and both<br>write it to the file and stream it to the frontend? If it reads it from
<br>the file, then is there any likelihood of the data being cached?<br><br><br>--<br>Joe Harvell<br>_______________________________________________<br>mythtv-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mythtv-users@mythtv.org">
mythtv-users@mythtv.org</a><br><a href="http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users">http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>