<div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div><span class="e" id="q_10650dfb3d0b2125_1">
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/13/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">John Erickson</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:jerickso@gmail.com" target="_blank">jerickso@gmail.com</a>
> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">On 9/13/05, Kevin Kuphal <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:kuphal@dls.net" target="_blank">
kuphal@dls.net</a>> wrote:<br>> Is there any reason to avoid the MCE version in a MythTV box? I only<br>> need the tuning capabilities, I don't care about the lack of FM in one <br>> or IR in the other.<br><br>
Nope, no reason to avoid them at all.<br><br>I run a pair of PVR-150MCE's in my backend.<br><br>-John<br>_______________________________________________<br><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/13/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Ashu Desai</b> <<a href="mailto:ashu.desai@gmail.com">ashu.desai@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">What if I am running a PVR-250 and I am planning to get a 2nd tuner card. Is there a reason why PVR-150 or PVR-150 MCE would have any problems when it comes to drivers?
<br><br>Thanks,<br>Ash. </blockquote></blockquote></div></span></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I doubt it. I run a PVR250, PVR250MCE and PVR500MCE in my box. The 500 is just two 150s, so I think this should apply to you as well.</div>
<div>I'm even running on older drivers (don't ask me which ones) from the atrpms testing branch, I have not updated them in over 2 months. I guess I've finally joined the 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' crowd.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>--g</div><br> </div>