<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/1/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Greg Woods</b> <<a href="mailto:greg@gregandeva.net">greg@gregandeva.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 09:02 -0400, Brian Stults wrote:<br>> Donavan Stanley wrote:<br><br>> > You don't USE a cable box with QAM.<br>> ><br>><br>> This really surprised me. I bought an HD3000 a long time ago to get it
<br>> before the FCC deadline. However, I haven't used it yet because I<br>> thought I would need to get another cable box to use QAM. So the tuner<br>> in the HD3000 can receive channels in the hundreds?<br><br>
What Donovan means (I think) is that cable companies do not generally<br>provide HD over QAM. </blockquote></div><br>
No that's not what I meat at all. I meant, you don't use a cable box to do QAM.<br>
<br>
I find it odd that people are obsessing over the cost of a box... You STILL have to pay for cable.<br>