[mythtv-users] scrpms

[Kirk Bocek]

On 6/22/2015 11:51 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 22/06/15 13:41, Stuart Auchterlonie wrote:
>> On 22/06/15 11:53, Stephen Collier wrote:
>>> It appears atrpms is now dead have not had anything official but it has
>>> been down for a number of weeks.
>>>
>>> I have been building mythtv rpms for EL6 to fedora 22 on an automated
>>> system for a year at http://scrpms.net/pub
>>>
>>> This has relied on some of the rpms in atrpms.  If you are using my 
>>> rpms
>>> they will still be built. I have all the atrpms src rpms and will build
>>> all that are needed over the next few weeks.
>>>
>>
>> I would recommend pulling non standard packages from rpmfusion.
>>
>> Stuff i'd previously found on atrpms, I now find on rpmfusion.
>>
>> Hope that helps
>
> ... but historically, iirc, ATrpms and rpmfusion were often thought to 
> be not fully compatible.   AIUI Stephen intends to continue in the 
> ATrpms line and provide self-consistent myth-related builds.  Great!
>
> I'm not aware of an rpmfusion repo for el7 clones;  nux-dextop seems 
> to be continuing that line, but rebuilds aren't frequent. My main box 
> is still running a home-build of master-with-qt4 using nux and other 
> non-scrpms el7 repos, but atop shows vmcom increasing slowly, and 
> task-swapping becomes sluggish.  I don't know why.
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
>
> looks like good el-related background reading.
>
> More Cheers,
> John P
>
>>
>>
>>> I have created a new email group at gmail groups scrpms-users.
>>>
>>> mythtv 0.27.5.1 is now in the repo.
>>>
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>> Cheers
>> Stuart
>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Stephen
>

So, Stephen, my take-away from my 0.24 to 0.27.4 upgrade travails was 
that SCRpms still needed both ATRpms and ELRepo. I think I heard you say 
you were going to take ATRpms out of the picture. Does one still need 
ELRepo?