[mythtv-users] Metadata Lookup Dependent Upon Extension?
jim
jim_32766 at hotmail.com
Sun Jan 18 18:49:39 UTC 2015
On 01/18/2015 01:14 PM, Mike Perkins wrote:
> On 18/01/15 17:20, jim wrote:
>> I've noticed something that doesn't seem right regarding how metadata
>> lookup performs when importing DVDs and naming the resulting files. I've
>> tested with several DVDs and the results are repeatable.
>>
>> Post the ripping process, using Browse Videos and Scan for Changes, I
>> find the following scenario.
>>
>> If a file is created, with proper DVD title, and without any extension,
>> the metadata lookup runs automatically with one of two results. If there
>> is no ambiguity in the on-line databases, the proper metadata is
>> returned, the presentation transitions from a black box with a large
>> white question mark to the DVD's coverart, etc. If there is ambiguity in
>> the on-line databases, a nice graphical interface is brought up to allow
>> the user to select the correct metadata package based on graphical and
>> textual information, and then the coverart appears, etc.
>>
>> If the exact same file is created, but with a .mkv extension, the
>> metatdata lookup functions differently. Some of the metadata may be
>> found, but no artwork is obtained. The artwork can still be obtained but
>> now requires user interaction, via several additional steps.
>>
>> Why should presence of a file extension cause this difference? Shouldn't
>> the metadata lookup strip off the extension and use only the title?
>>
>> The DVDs are all ripped as h.264 using a mkv container. The only
>> difference is the presence or absence of the .mkv file extension in the
>> file name.
>> Several other processes in my system require proper file extensions, and
>> I believe having the extension is a best practice. A similar filing
>> structure, /mythtv/videos/title/title.mkv, is used for all the ripped
>> DVDs.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> I've recently ripped some DVDs using Handbrake to h.264 in an .mkv
> container - basically, just using the Handbrake defaults. I have not
> noticed the scenario you describe.
>
> I /did/ notice that the metadata collection suddenly sprang into life
> recently after never having worked before. A recent rebuild might have
> triggered that.
>
> Perhaps it depends which version you are using? Mine is:
>
> $ mythfrontend --version
> Please attach all output as a file in bug reports.
> MythTV Version : v0.27.4
> MythTV Branch :
> Network Protocol : 77
> Library API : 0.27.20141016-1
> QT Version : 4.8.2
> Options compiled in:
>
> This is the stock deb-multimedia package.
>
Is v0.27-193 an older version than v0.27.4? If so that may account for
the difference.
Please attach all output as a file in bug reports.
MythTV Version : v0.27-193-g8ee257c
MythTV Branch : fixes/0.27
Network Protocol : 77
Library API : 0.27.20140323-1
QT Version : 4.8.6
I have been using the version and update process available via the
Software Manager in Linux Mint 17.1. I'll have to look into getting the
package from the source instead.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list