[mythtv-users] List of recordings by disc drive - Solved - now storage strategies

Hika van den Hoven hikavdh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 08:45:41 UTC 2015


Hoi Stephen,

Tuesday, February 10, 2015, 4:23:25 AM, you wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:58:23 -0500, you wrote:

>>On 02/09/2015 04:47 PM, Karl Newman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The general sense on this list is that it's cheaper to add
>>> storage than to spend the electricity to transcode in order to
>>> save space. Obviously you already have a number of disks so I'm
>>> guessing you have physical space reasons for wanting to
>>> transcode instead of adding drives.
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, mythlink.pl <http://mythlink.pl> doesn't rename files; it
>>> creates symbolic links with meaningful names which point to the
>>> original files. You can completely customize how the files are
>>> named, but it doesn't look like you can group it by disk/path
>>> location or by storage group.
>>>
>>> Karl
>>
>>
>>MythLink:  Ah, excellent.
>>
>>
>>More storage:  My Back End motherboard (2011) has 6 SATA ports 
>>available.  Four 1.8 TB discs, one DVD, one system/database 
>>disc.  I could buy higher-capacity drives or new system.  I like 
>>having four spindles, as I almost never record more than four 
>>shows at once.
>>
>>If I increase Back End storage, I have to do something about my 
>>rsync back-up PC.  It has a 2008 motherboard with three 4 TB 
>>discs and a system disc.  Two of the 4 TB drives are dedicated 
>>for MythTV back-up, the remaining 4 TB drive backs up all the 
>>rest of the systems here.
>>
>>Conversely, if I transcode, unless it is PBS or TCM, I usually 
>>have a new file that is 2/3 the size of the original.  Even 
>>smaller if I get rid of program portions I don't want, or decide 
>>not to keep the recording.
>>
>>My present 8 TB system, with recordings since 2011, has 6.2 TB 
>>used, 23% free.  I'm almost 70 years old.  With transcoding, I 
>>might die before running out of space on the existing system.
>>
>>John Finlay has piqued my interest about transcoding to h264...
>>
>>
>>Mike

> Transcoding is a lot of work.  When TV here was MPEG2 recordings, I
> tried doing it.  But you needed to cut the ads out and trim the excess
> at each end of the recording, and there was no way to automate that so
> I had to spend time manually editing files.  It was far too time
> consuming, even if I automated the actual transcoding.  I found it
> much easier just to add more storage.

Ah, but it's not waisted time, because with the adds gone, watching
gives so much more quality watching!

> Two new 6 Tbyte drives, one for the MythTV box and one for the backup
> box, is not that expensive.
> _______________________________________________





Tot mails,
  Hika                            mailto:hikavdh at gmail.com

"Zonder hoop kun je niet leven
Zonder leven is er geen hoop
Het eeuwige dilemma
Zeker als je hoop moet vernietigen om te kunnen overleven!"

De lerende Mens



More information about the mythtv-users mailing list