[mythtv-users] CentOS and 0.27-fixes (which really just means always-latest)
John Pilkington
J.Pilk at tesco.net
Wed Apr 23 22:21:24 UTC 2014
On 23/04/14 22:33, HP-mini wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 16:44 -0400, Tom Lichti wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:15 PM, HP-mini <blm-ubunet at slingshot.co.nz>
>> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 09:08 -0400, Tom Lichti wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Seconded. I just (in the last two weeks) moved my backend
>> from Redhat
>> > to Ubuntu (14.04) and it was super simple. I even added a
>> new page
>> > with the compile steps in the MythTV wiki for 14.04.
>>
>> If you are referring to this:
>> http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Trusty_Tahr_Installation
>> this is incomplete if not just wrong.
>> You have to configure/build/install mythtv libs etc before
>> doing the
>> same for mythplugins.
>>
>> Could mention mythweb & mythtv-scripts git sources.
>>
>>
>> I'm not disputing that it's incomplete, but I can say that it's not
>> wrong, in that if you follow those steps, you will have compiled
>> binaries that should allow you to complete an installation, if you
>> are
>
> You can not configure/build/install the mythplugins without having
> mythtv libraries installed first.
>
> The steps in that wiki page are in the wrong order.
>
> If you configure/build/install the mythplugins package first then you
> are building against a previous/old/distro-package libraries.
> This is a potential disaster.
That sounds a good point; I have used a lightly modified version of the
rpmfusion specfile to build complete sets of rpm packages (for both SL6
and F19) which then get installed en bloc. I haven't noticed problems
that might have resulted from that process. My builds haven't used
mock, but I had thought that they would be equivalent to those from the
repos. Do they have this logical problem too? Perhaps I should look
more closely to see if the specfile does things that are even cleverer
than I thought.
John P
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list