[mythtv-users] OT: unreliable firmware load after cold boot

Devin Heitmueller dheitmueller at kernellabs.com
Wed Jul 18 19:37:45 UTC 2012


On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:01 PM, R. G. Newbury <newbury at mandamus.org> wrote:
> Which of course makes perfect and reasonable sense. The problem is how to
> work around a situation where the invocation is not happening correctly. I
> presume that there are a series of pokes and peeks, but they are internal to
> the module code and not exposed. We really need to latch onto something
> exposed, and unique.
>
> And it may not exist.
>
> And as you say, there are lots of hardware items which use different
> chipsets internally, while declaring that they are twins to a different
> model. Or they just report themselves wrongly anyway!

Let me ask around and see if I can get my hands on a 2250.  The
problem I ran into the last time somebody suggested that module
loading order fixed it was actually a race condition related to udev
calling v4l-id while the digital side of the board was still
initializing.

Can you send me the actual symptoms you encounter (including the dmesg
output showing any error messages during initialization)?

Devin

-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list