[mythtv-users] Is interleaving memory still the best bet for an Atom?
Raymond Wagner
raymond at wagnerrp.com
Mon Jan 9 21:03:58 UTC 2012
On 1/9/2012 14:47, Matt Emmott wrote:
> A friend of mine is looking into the Zotac Zbox to replace a failed
> Front End. I remember reading some discussion on this list that two
> RAM sticks are better than one, as the interleaving will help video
> playback performance.
You're talking about two completely different things. A memory module
is going to contain a number of banks, and each bank may be busy on some
task at any given time. If a bank is busy, a different bank can be
accessed in the mean time. In hard drive terminology, consider
non-interleaved memory to be like a bunch of spanned drives, while
interleaved memory to be like a RAID0 stripe. Better for some types of
load, worse for others, but really not something you should need to be
concerned about.
On the other hand, one module versus two is about memory channels. Most
modern systems have two channels, while higher end ones can have three
or four. Two modules of DDR3-1333 on one channel will do 10GB/s,
regardless of whether it is interleaved or not. Two modules on two
separate channels will do 20GB/s.
On older ION systems, the video chip ran off the system memory, and
system memory became a real issue as some users found low speed memory
would starve the decoder. On newer ION2 systems, the video chip has
dedicated memory, and since the CPU itself isn't doing much of anything
(and doesn't have the power even if you wanted it to), memory
performance isn't that important. Of course, with memory as cheap as it
is, there is no point to trying to save $10 by only getting one stick of
memory.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list