[mythtv-users] Mythbackend Service not starting up after 0.25 upgrade

A Desai ashu.desai at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 02:16:01 UTC 2012


My apologies. I put my next post on a separate thread with x.x.x.x for the
IP.

Ash.



On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Larry K <lunchtimelarry at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Zarthan South <zarthan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>>>> It is less confusing to everyone if you just XXX out the middle two
>>>> octets as in 192.XXX.XXX.15
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see any reason to obscure a NATed IP address.  Does this present
>>> some sort of vulnerability or risk?
>>>
>>>
>> While an internal NATed address isn't a vulnerability in itself it is a
>> piece of information that can be used when mounting an attack. If you
>> always use the XXX to block out a NATed address you won't forget when you
>> post that type information from work where it can be used. The poster
>> obviously wanted to conceal their address hence my suggestion.
>>
>
> Yeah, I was just trying to understand how a NATed address could be used,
> as you say, by an attacker.
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mythtv-users mailing list
>> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
>> http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
> http://www.mythtv.org/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>
>


-- 
http://about.me/adesai
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20120417/0315a726/attachment.html>


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list