[mythtv-users] mythtv/master commit: 53cf459f3 by David Engel (gigem)

blind_Pete 0123peter at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 05:22:35 UTC 2011

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David Engel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:07:55PM -0700, Yeechang Lee wrote:
> > David Engel <david at istwok.net> says:
> > > Would you rather have a fully padded recording of a lower
> > > priority showing or a less/un- padded recording of a higher priority
> > > showing?

Are you asking what priority to assign to the soft padding at either 
end of a program?  I would assume negative maxint, unless you want 
to make it user configurable.  

> > Higher priority; for me, that's the whole point of higher
> > priority. Soft padding has always been for me something's that's nice
> > to have for a recording when possible, but if I *need* padding hard
> > padding is always available.

It took me a while to realise that there is a choice of padding methods, 
but having a choice is good.  

> That's exactly how I feel, but I suspect at least some of our friends
> in Oz probably prefer the full padding due to their networks'
> inability to tell time.

Sadly, the solution seems to be, buy more tuners.  

blind Pete 
Sig goes here... 

More information about the mythtv-users mailing list