On 07/13/11 21:43, Steve Malenfant wrote: > 239.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 224.0.0.0 * 240.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 I doubt this matters, but why do you have two separate routing entries for the 239/8 subnet?