[mythtv-users] Multiplexing vs multiple cards

Gavin Hurlbut gjhurlbu at gmail.com
Thu Nov 4 17:28:05 UTC 2010


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Steven Adeff <adeffs.mythtv at gmail.com> wrote:
> As others have said, the demand on your hard drives goes up with every
> additional stream being recorded. Ideally you would have one drive per
> possible stream in storage groups. For instance, I have two DVB cards
> and I have them set to multiplex up to three channels since where I'm
> at I have a few frequencies with 3 channels. I also have two cable
> boxes. I have six 500GB SATA drives set up using storage groups. I
> have yet to have any issues with my hard drives not being able to keep
> up with the simultaneous recordings, viewings and commflagging.

The demand on the drives obviously goes up with every stream, however,
I think people are maybe overinflating that demand.  Modern hard
drives can easily deal with 50-60 MB/s (even the slow ones).  This
translates to 400-480Mbit/s.  HD streams over the air, etc, use up to
about 36Mbit/s for the entire multiplex (Is my math right there,
Raymond?).  Hence, even with "slow" 5400RPM drives, you should have no
issues at all with the disks if you are being somewhat careful.
Granted, the seeking overhead kicks in, but even then, even the slow
drives should be able to easily deal with 7 or 8 *multiplexes*
recording at a time.  Not many of us even get close to that.

Of course, you'd need to keep the mysql database on different drives,
etc.  But really, if you are using current drives, your drives
shouldn't be the bottleneck for quite some time.

Am I missing something here?


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list