[mythtv-users] Firewire no longer required on HD STBs
Simon Hobson
linux at thehobsons.co.uk
Wed Jun 30 19:46:07 UTC 2010
Eric Sharkey wrote:
> > was it actually usable for anything useful ? I mean looking at it from the
>> TV manufacturers point of view - was it worth the effort of implementing it
>> if they still had to connect the box via HDMI/Component/Something to show
>> channels not available via FireWire ?
>
>There are essentially no channels not available via FireWire; that's
>the whole point of the mandate.
>
>From a MythTV point of view, 5C encryption knocks out a lot of content
>and we often think that anything with 5C enabled is "not available",
>but that's not true from the point of view of a television
>manufacturer. They're supposed to follow the 5C spec and they can
>decrypt that stuff. At least, that's how it was supposed to work.
Hmm, someone point out where my logic fails here ...
* It's OK for the stuff on FireWire (or the new ethernet option) to
be encrypted because a TV set manufacturer can decrypt it.
* The cable network uses common standards - at least I imagine the
cable companies are too tight to pay to have their own proprietary
kit made (I assume a lot of it is common and just has their name on
the front).
* Some TVs have cable tuners/decoders.
So in theory it should be possible for a standard TV to tune,
decrypt, and decode off-the-cable signals. Though I guess it would
need a slot for a subscription card.
At which point the penny drops - the cable companies probably won't
release a CI module as they'd rather make their subscribers pay over
and over again for a grotty decoder box.
--
Simon Hobson
Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list