[mythtv-users] PCI-E Analog Card

Another Sillyname anothersname at googlemail.com
Sun Jan 24 18:47:15 UTC 2010


2010/1/24 Another Sillyname <anothersname at googlemail.com>:
> 2010/1/24 Brian Wood <beww at beww.org>:
>> On Sunday 24 January 2010 11:01:00 am Another Sillyname wrote:
>>> 2010/1/24 Brent Norris <brent at brentnorris.net>:
>>> One solution is to go for a motherboard like an Asus P5WDG2 Pro which
>>> supports PCI-X slots.  The bus structure of the board splits the PCI
>>> slots from the PCI-X slots (you can plug a Hauppauge 500 into a PCI-X
>>> slot because I do) and you shouldn't get bus saturation.
>>>
>>> I run a backend with 2 dual terrestrial and 3 satellite feeds (all
>>> digital though) but with multirec that's 8 terrestrial and 6 satellite
>>> on that board.  The most I've had recording was two HiDef channels at
>>> about 8gb per hour, 3 satellite channels at about 4.5GB per hour and 6
>>> terrestrial at about 1.6GB per hour all at the same time.  With the
>>> loading split it worked like a charm.
>>>
>>> It is a quad core processor with 4 hard disks to spread the recording
>>> load as well.
>>
>> I agree with you, I have many PCI-X server boards, they can be had cheaply
>> today, and perform very well, though they do draw a lot of watts (or rather
>> the CPUs that fit into them do).
>>
>> But the OP wants to use a new server, with PCIe slots, so let's see what we
>> can find to help him do that.
>>
>> If power consumption is a factor, this will probably be better for him.
>>
>> Looking at his situation, I think the main thing is to be certain what sort of
>> signals the cable company sending him, and how that might change in the
>> future.
>>
>> Nobody wants to make a substantial investment in hardware and time, only to
>> have to re-do it when the cable company decides to go all digital.
>>
>> If it were me, I'd start by sitting down with a cable company exec, and finding
>> out what their plans might be, assuming they even know.
>>
>> Since his new server has gigabit NICs, perhaps multiple HDHRs would work, if
>> the channels he wants are available as clear QAM, and will continue to be.
>> This will remove any dependency on a particular type of slot.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mythtv-users mailing list
>> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
>> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
>>
>
> Well in that case...
>
> Asus P6T6 or even better P6T7 (the 7 has a pretty clever bus
> distribution system IIRC).
>
> But by definition that's still going to suck power.
>
> I missed the start of this conversation, any chance you could recap
> what exactly you're trying to do and the reasoning behind it....My
> system has a single backend as described above but feeds up to 10
> frontends (some are laptops) so I've got some experience in this area.
>
> Also I use Asterisk with 7970's , would never go back to normal
> phones.  Have you thought of using bluetooth rather then your existing
> handsets and get the system to redirect when you walk into the house
> (bluetooth scanner to detect the MAC in your mobile phone), works
> pretty well (not quite perfectly yet!!).
>

Don't worry about the recap I had it in my bin and pulled it out.

I'm a little confused.

You seem to be talking about over the air muxing of analog channels?
My understanding of US OTA broadcast was it was using DVB-T where
cahnnels were muxed (so a HVR 2250 card would be ideal).  I'm not
aware of any analog OTA muxing?


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list