[mythtv-users] PVR-500 picture quality
jerome at supernet.ab.ca
Mon Feb 1 06:51:48 UTC 2010
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Joey Morris <rjmorris at nc.rr.com> wrote:
> I'm new to MythTV, and I've installed a PVR-500 to capture standard
> def programming from my cable company. The picture quality of the
> captured streams appears to be slightly lower than what I see when I
> connect the cable directly to my standard def TV. This is true for the
> card's coax connection (connecting directly from the wall) and for its
> composite and S-Video connections (connecting from the cable box).
> I've made sure the recording resolution is 720x480, I've increased the
> bitrates to 7000/8000, I'm using a G210 card with VDPAU enabled, and
> I've tried using a signal amplifier. I think I may be maxing out my
> PVR-500's performance.
> The quality is certainly tolerable. Although I notice the difference
> when comparing them side-by-side, I'm not sure I would if I viewed the
> card's output in isolation. Is the slight drop in picture quality just
> the nature of analog capture? Those of you using the PVR-500s, do you
> just live with it so you can enjoy the numerous benefits of MythTV? Or
> are there other things I can try to make the picture quality match
> what I see when I connect the cable box directly to the TV? If I
> eventually move to HD, can I expect a similarly slight quality drop
> when using the component output to an HD-PVR?
> mythtv-users mailing list
> mythtv-users at mythtv.org
It's the PVR-500. There is a certain loss of sharpness relative to a
standard TV. It can vary with channel, even with day. Some channels show
distinct herringbone, some seem to be quantized funny. I RMAed my first
one because I thought it was bad. I had the cable company in to check all
my connections. MythTV 0.22 made things better, especially the
deinterlacer - picking the right profile made a noticeable difference. I
have an old NVidia onboard that can't do VDPAU.
I've come to live with it - I judge it to be 80% as crisp as TV, but
totally worth it for the MythTV experience. Going to HD means going to
digital and that's just not worth the effort. I just watched a MythBusters
that was shot in HD but letterboxed to SD and it was as good as it gets.
One thing that will help encourage people to HD is the differences in
handling of the HD material shown on SD channels. Discovery letterboxes,
whereas PBS clips. The nice e-mail I got from PBS claims nothing can be
done about it - so it might be a capability issue or simply laziness.
A signal amplifier may make the problem worse since overdriving the
later-model tuners makes the LNAs (Low Noise Amplifiers) noisier. There is
some fiddling you could try with IVTV.
If your picture wuality is only "slightly lower" then you're doing pretty
More information about the mythtv-users