[mythtv-users] Interesting Reading: Windows Secrets reviews AppleTV and GoogleTV
trag at io.com
Thu Dec 9 20:38:52 UTC 2010
> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:43:11 -0600
> From: Ben Kamen <bkamen at benjammin.net>
> On 12/9/2010 12:29 PM, Brian Wood wrote:
>> Another case of using fear after 9/11 to generate bigger profits for the
>> corporate world. Of course HD was on the drawing board before 2001, but
>> 9/11 was used to push it over the edge, since consumers were not
>> sufficiently clamoring for it.
>> But somehow the only beneficiaries are the media companies, cable
>> companies, broadcast equipment manufacturers and consumer electronics
> yep! I had considered that. We the consumers gets some "flashier" stuff
> that doesn't really add much to the experience of TV viewing.
I find it a net disadvantage. I get my content OTA, and during analog
broadcast, when (if) a station got a little weak, I never really noticed.
They all tuned fine.
Now, I'm tweaking my antenna trying to find that magic spot where I won't
get the drop outs that make a show unwatchable on any of the stations. A
little snow doesn't make an analog broadcast unintelligible. A frozen
picture and dtauh, dtauh, dtauh, from the sound does make a digital
broadcast unintelligible and very unpleasant to watch. Especially with
the tuner throwing up "Signal weak or lost" messages. I think some of
this is multipath problems, but that wasn't a problem for me under analog
My experience is that digital broadcast is less convenient, more
expensive, and ultimately of lower quality, since any increase in
resolution is discounted by a lost ability to actually watch some programs
in their entirety.
I guess those sub-channels are nice for someone. It isn't me. At first,
one of the stations here added one and put the Retro-TV network on it, and
that was very nice. After six months they made it into a spanish language
station. Now we have more spanish language stations than english, which
isn't a disadvantage, but it is of zero benefit to me.
> However, electronics makers get to sell us new stuff.
> Movie makers get to sell (in some cases RE-sell) us new media.
> The supply chain (broadcasters) have to buy all new stuff...
>> It's getting harder and harder to not be a conspiracy theorist.
It's not a conspiracy. It's an emergent system based on the simple rules
of greed, stupidity, dishonesty and complacency.
More information about the mythtv-users