[mythtv-users] backends without tuners (was Re: Transcoding is being done on frontends, not backend)
Brad DerManouelian
myth at dermanouelian.com
Fri Jan 9 01:05:51 UTC 2009
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, jarpublic at gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Brad DerManouelian <myth at dermanouelian.com
> > wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Bill Williamson wrote:
>
> > Is this still true? About a year ago I was reccomended a "master
> > backend without tuners" setup (all storage on master backend, all
> > tuners on net-booting slave backends) on this very list...
>
>
> Recommend by someone who either didn't read or chose to ignore this
> thread:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/310919#310919
>
>
> I am a little confused now. I was aware of the fact that tunerless
> backends are unsupported. But in the thread that this one branch
> from, I thought it was said that running a frontend only system
> without a backend is also unsupported. So if only FE/BE or BE
> systems are officially supported and only BE with tuners are
> supported, then what is a supported FE only machine? Does this
> actually mean that on a FE only machine we should install BE but we
> should then take steps post install to make sure the BE doesn't run,
> because there are no tuners? Or have misunderstood what was said?
> This seems awfully convoluted to me.
Sorry, where does it say running a frontend without a backend is
unsupported?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20090108/cc732e3c/attachment.htm
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list