[mythtv-users] Time to take the next step...
VCRAddict
MythTV_01 at appropriate-tech.net
Sun Nov 16 07:49:09 UTC 2008
At 10:44 PM 11/15/08 -0800, Allen Edwards wrote:
>
> I think you need more processor power for ATSC system. I have a
> frontend only with a 2.4GHz P4 and it is not quite fast enough
But you're talking about a system which includes a Front-End (and one which
supports high-def playback, at that). That is not the situation I'm
dealing with. The new system will be a Back-End ONLY. My understanding is
that this reduces the host system CPU/memory requirements *drastically*, as
compared to a FE/BE system.
> even running XvMC (which you do not want to run).
Why, pray tell, would I not want to run XvMC? I'm using it now on the
existing (stand-alone) FE/BE system, and it seems to do just fine -- tho'
admittedly, I've yet to try playing back any high-def content.
> My FE/BE runs a 5400+ and it is fine.
I should hope so!
> HDHR is the way to go. Small, low power, built in IR Rx.
So then, Myth *does* use an IR blaster to control the HDHR? If so, and
presuming multiple HDHR boxes stacked up on the shelf, I'd need multiple IR
blasters hung off the Myth box, *and* I'd need to jury-rig some way of
"dedicating" each IR emitter to *that* particular HDHR, with no possibility
of "crosstalk" between them.
This is starting to sound more and more Rube Goldberg -ish.
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list