[mythtv-users] New Frontend, Any gotchas with Compact Flash storage
Brian Wood
beww at beww.org
Sun Mar 2 15:29:57 UTC 2008
On Mar 2, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> To add some anecdotal evidence, my heavily-used CF-based frontend
> has been performing very well. It is completely silent (zero moving
> parts) and I find bootup times and general performance comparable to
> a hard drive-based frontend. I didn't do anything special to the
> file system (it's ext3, and has a small swap partition) and thus far
> have had no trouble. Setting it up like this may well not be the
> best idea, as others have said.
My personal experience using flash devices (with an NSLU2) has shown
that the "conventional wisdom" that it will fail after a short period
of heavy writes is incorrect. I have been running a complete Debian
system from a flash device for close to a year now. I guess the wear
leveling is working.
But having said that, swapping to a flash device is generally
considered a bad idea. Mounting partitions with the "noatime"
parameter will also reduce writes, but some applications want the
access times updated to work properly.
You may have noticed vast price differences between similar capacity
devices. The differences are speed and the quality (or even the
existence of) wear leveling. Of course it can be hard to determine
these parameters from the package or from a catalog or online listing.
beww
More information about the mythtv-users
mailing list