[mythtv-users] Odd behaviour when a program is scheduled to record by two schedules at once
kkuphal at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 15:31:19 UTC 2008
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Nick Morrott <knowledgejunkie at gmail.com>
> On 19/06/2008, David Engel <david at istwok.net> wrote:
> > a record all on any channel rule. In your case, both schedules are
> > record all on any channel so a tie breaker is used and the schedule
> > which was create earlier wins. If you recreate your rules in the
> > opposite order, you should get what you want.
> Without seeking reprisals from the scheduling gods, could you please
> explain why, in the case of such a tie, the overall priority does not
> dictate which rule wins when their specificity is the same? The
> frontend offers an easy way to view/increase/decrease priority for
> rules, but a complicated rule could take a fair amount of effort to
How could the overall priorities be different in the case of a tie? If the
priorities were different, the higher priority item would win. The only way
you have a tie where the age of the rule comes into effect is in the case of
identical resulting priorities on different rules.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mythtv-users