[mythtv-users] Antenna attenuation question

Alen Edwards allen.edwards at oldpaloalto.com
Tue Jul 1 07:47:36 UTC 2008



Daniel wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>   
>> Brian Wood wrote:
>> On Monday 30 June 2008 21:21:25 Daniel wrote:
>>    there is no such thing as multi path interference with
>> digital broadcast......I have three antennas on my tower pointed in three
>> different direction, amp on each one combined in my basement......
>>
>>
>> Say What ??? !!!
>>
>> It manifests itself somewhat differently, but you can definitely have
>> multipath problems with digital broadcasts, especially in reflector strewn
>> areas like Manhattan.
>>
>> beww
>> Multipath is a huge problem for digital transmissions which is why they 
>> have
>> equalizers to remove the multipath.  If you get more multipath than the
>> circuits can correct, the receiver can no longer get the signal.  If you
>> have less than that, it isn't a problem.
>>
>> I used to build equipment to test this stuff.
>> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,062,148.PN.&OS=PN/5,062,148&RS=PN/5,062,148
>>
>> Allen
>>
>>
>> I do not think you understand how 8-vsb(VSB) is working
>> see. http://www.broadcast.net/~sbe1/8vsb/8vsb.htm..
>> ....it is possible to have (dynamic multi path interference)  i.e.. trees 
>> in
>> high wind (moving objects between the transmitting and receiving 
>> antennas),
>> it is impossible to receive a  8vsb-modulated HDTV signal in a moving
>> vehicle..........
>>
>> but as far as multi path interference i.e.. antenna on your house with no
>> trees directly in front of it......YOU WILL NOT HAVE....multi path
>> interference.....unless your house is going down the road or moving....if 
>> it
>> is flying through the air you might be allright..
>>
>>
>>     
> I don't really want to get into an argument, I am just trying to help
> this guy out with his problem.  Let me just say that I have met with the
> people who invented 8-vsb.  I visited them at Zenith before it was
> bought by LG, while they were still inventing it and fighting with GI
> over which spec would become the standard.  Suffice it to say that I
> believe I know what I am talking about.
>
> Now, that said, you are correct in the the equalizers will have a
> difficult time with moving multipath.  This was a big problem in the
> early days of 8vsb in that the signal would go out if a helicopter went
> by or an airplane.  So, they do handle some moving multipath but you are
> correct that it is not designed to deal with a moving vehicle.
>
> It is designed to deal with static multipath.  However, all equalizers
> fail at some point and they do so rather quickly and catastrophically.
> If you put in enough multipath, the equalizers won't be able to deal
> with it as good as they are.
>
> This guy clearly has the potential of having the multipath problem he is
> worried about as he is getting the main signal off the back of the
> antenna.  The reflected path may even be stronger than the main path.  I
> guarantee you that if the reflected path is the same strength as the
> main path, the equalizer will not be able to deal with it.
>
> The guy who said Manhattan is a problem is also correct.  In the
> concrete jungle, you can have very strong reflected signals.  These can
> exceed the ability of the equalizer to deal with it.
>
> That said, I don't think the problem is multipath because he said that
> removing the amplifier gain makes the signal come in fine.  If it was a
> multipath problem, that would not be the case.
>
> So, we agree that he is probably not having multipath problems but I
> would not rule it out because of the signal being behind the antenna.
>
> Allen
>
> I do not have a way with words like your self.....I am sure you know how the 
> least mean squares (LMS) algorithm work and the different tap weights etc.
>
> I am just trying to suggest point another antenna in the other direction 
> with a amp .......and combine them in the house.....this will not cause a 
> co-channel or multi path problem: as, it would with analog TV
>
> people try to tell me I did not know what I am talking about........I forget 
> people can not hear what i am thinking. HA HA 
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>   
Might work and may be worth a try.  It would work if his problem is that 
there is multipath and making the back channel stronger w ith the second 
antenna brings the direct path sufficiently above the reflected path.  
You need to hope you are not getting any indirect paths for the other 
stations off that new antenna or you could introduce more multipath.

On the other hand, if it is tuner overload as he thinks and I think, 
then this will not help.

I am going to post another reply on how to make a variable attenuator 
for the guy to try.

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users/attachments/20080701/794f0ef4/attachment.htm 


More information about the mythtv-users mailing list